This is the challenge for the future of the left

How do you consider the first part of the campaign

I am quite amazed to hear the General égrainées by the UMP and PS. They are one and the other, incompatible promises with the Treaty of Lisbon that they want to ratify. For example, the UMP, I quote, wants to "bridge the gap that exists between the States in matters of common social norm". Except that social harmonization is prohibited by the Treaty of Lisbon! The PS, he need to change the majority to hunt the Liberals. However, he almost vote all the time with them to the European Parliament. He did, for example, for the directive on the deregulation of the energy market. And Modem! Him, he claims limit the free movement of capital and introduce a Tobin type tax... It is interesting... especially if one remembers that the Modem deputies voted against the Tobin tax and that the Lisbon Treaty prohibits any restriction on the movement of capital. All of this, it is the widespread smoking out! This prohibits a serious debate. I understand to be liberal, but I do not understand that it is not assumed it. In the same way, I understand to be favourable to the Lisbon Treaty, but I do not accept that it conceals.

But you, what do you propose

First of all, we want that is respected the vote of the French, who have rejected the Constitutional Treaty in 2005. We call, therefore, to vote against parties who support him. Then, the crisis I find essential to implement a social shield. We need to harmonize the different social legislation of the countries of the Union, to make social dumping impossible. This proposal, only can make without make a mockery of the world those who oppose the Treaty of Lisbon. Finally, it is fundamental that Europe is independent from the US! Stop the military integration with them. And, in the economic field, also, we are against the creation of the "single market transatlantic" deregulated decided by the European Parliament.

The PS and UMP, is white and white bonnet bonnet

Not, of course. But, in so far as Europe is concerned, one and the other here interpret a comedy. They have postures of opposition and, as soon as they are in the European Parliament, they agree as usual: they co-manage the Parliament but also the European Commission.

You do not criticize the NPA of Olivier Besancenot. This is an oversight or is voluntary

I avoid! The other left exceeds 15 percent in voting intentions. It's a lot. This shows that we could be in PS, if we were United. Unfortunately, the we do not, in spite of all the efforts made by the left Front. I hope that voters will nominate the unit left rather than the solitary left. This is the challenge for the future of the left.

The PS in the useful vote calls. That her answer you

It is the first time that the PS was also sectarian attitude. Its electoral calculation is wrong. For example, in the Ile-de-France, when considering current voting intentions and that it performs a projection, we realize that there is a seat that will return either the UMP, the left Front. The useful vote in this case is the vote for the left Front. In any event, we will have many voices of electors of the PS, because we are consistent with their rejection of the Constitutional Treaty. And then people want to punish the squabbles of ego of the Rue de Solferino. Finally, by voting for us, left voters have a guarantee against the temptations of alliance at the centre.